Salut,
une méta-analyse parue dans le British Journal of Psychology, sur la sensation d'être observé (staring effect).
Je cite l'abstract :
"It is concluded that there are hints of an effect, but also a shortage of independent replications and theoretical concepts."
Je cite l'introduction :
"The overall significance for the two data sets calculated using the Stouffer Z method was p = .0000007 (direct mental interaction) and p = .000054 (remote staring), respectively.
One could conclude that the data indicate the existence of some as yet unknown effect of distant intentionality. Our goal was to assess whether this strong claim an stand up to critical evaluation from a sceptical perspective."
Je pense que les objections des sceptiques n'ont pas été oubliées ici. Qu'en pensez-vous ?
Source : http://www.uniklinik-freiburg.de/iuk...A_BJP_2004.pdf
-----
